Tag Archives: budget

On Healthcare and Country-Care: Radio Essay for May 21, 2012

If you were on the playground 40-odd years ago, you might hear names such as Bob and Billy and Joe. You still hear them today. Names I did not hear were these: Mumtaz; Chetan; Bimalkumar; Narenda. I’ve heard them as an adult, and especially so this week. You see, my mother needed surgery this week. She’d fallen and broken her hip bone. So, these four gentlemen, a cardiologist, an endocrinologist, a pulmonary specialist and an internist, and a host of other medical professionals of numerous nationalities, cared for my mom with great talent and skill. To be sure, there were plenty of native born Americans in the hospital but not enough.

These doctors immigrated to the United States for many reasons, I am sure. Clearly, they sought to maximize their own opportunities for career advancement but they also were answering a need here in the United States for skilled professionals. They fill roles that would otherwise go unfilled. Most importantly, they came here through legal means and they contribute.

Despite the high unemployment and underemployment we are experiencing in this country, somewhere between 2 to 3 million jobs stubbornly cannot be filled. And so we look towards recruiting immigrants to fill those jobs. It brings opportunity to them and fills a tremendous void in our country. Contrast this to the espoused position of those who would open the flood gates to illegals who bring with them nothing but a desire to leave their own country and seek to take more than they can ever give.

My personal events of this week also highlight the absolute quality of healthcare in America. Though my mother would deny it, she is no spring chicken. She is a complicated patient requiring a whole host of specialists to manage her care. I watched all of these people coordinate care with compassion and concern. My mother may not be young, but her work on this earth is not yet done; and through their skilled hands, that work will continue.

I could not help but wonder how this growing debate between the rival philosophies of Obamacare and the Republican budget authored by Paul Ryan would affect my mom’s case. Under the Paul Ryan plan, nothing would change for my mom. That plan keeps the faith with today’s retirees and those 55 and older. For my mom, it is a moot point. Not so under the Obama plan. We know that Medicare will be cut by $500 billion; that the number of Doctors will diminish while the number of people under care will increase; that a panel of 15 politically appointed bureaucrats would sit in judgment as to whether a person like my mom is a candidate for the surgery she just received.

President Obama frequently reminds us about the social contact in America. The Paul Ryan plan is the only plan that recognizes this contract. It’s the Obama plan that throws grandma under the bus. Who are we kidding? Does the President think we cannot read nor do math? The President and the Democrat establishment are using extreme scare tactics to peddle their agenda. The Paul Ryan plan is utilizing fact and logic to find a way forward for future care while honoring the commitment we, as a country, have made to our citizens.

I think the bravest person in Washington right now is Paul Ryan. He has been a consistent advocate for a sustainable future for this country. He has bucked the powers from both sides of the aisle. He has withstood the ridicule of the piranhas in DC who benefit from fear mongering and whose political fortunes rely upon shadowy half truths.

My mother’s experience this week has brought a lot of focus and personal skin to the game of the Federal budget debate. Meaningful reform in the entitlement areas of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security hold the key to unlock the prosperity of the future. Time is running out.

Press on.
http://www.tomwesley.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Essay

The Tom Wesley and John Weston Review: May 14, 2011

Leave a comment

Filed under uStream

On the Whole Truth: Radio Essay for May 14, 2011

You have heard this oath stated so many times that you can recite it in your sleep: I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God.” So why is it that so many politicians engage in half-truths? Do two half-truths make a whole? And by politician, I am referring to our own President Obama who visited the Mexican border in El Paso, TX, this week to lecture the nation on something that we already know: we are a nation of immigrants. He reminded us of the inspiration, invention and innovation that have sprung into our national heritage from immigrant stock. Right he is on this point. My family is a product of the immigrant journey. Both sets of my Grandparents came through Ellis Island and established a home in New York City. My parents were raised there and established their life together. Were it not for immigration, I would not be here. I get that.

So, what half of what the President said on the border this week was less than wholly true? The mighty presumption is that all immigrants who arrive here are entitled to equal protection under the law regardless of whether or not they came here legally. Somehow, legal behavior is optional. And, if you have a romantic story to tell about how you broke the law and achieved, so much the better.

The President told the story of Jose Hernandez, a child of migrant Mexican parents, who aspired to become an astronaut, and became one. (Astronaut Hernandez was actually born in this country so he is entitled to US citizenship.) The implication is that every illegal is a diamond in the rough. Here is the other half of the truth: for every success story such as Mr. Hernandez, there are hundreds more who are members of drug cartels and Mexican gangs such as MS-13. They are responsible for driving a dagger even deeper into the heart of our cities and towns in America. Also missing from the untruthful half is the fact that if we cannot secure our borders from Mexicans, neither can we secure them from Saudis or Yemenis or Iranians who wish to do us harm. It is romantic, indeed, to believe that everyone who crosses the border to America shares the Emma Lazarus notion that every immigrant is tired or poor or yearning to breathe free. Too many wish us harm and all who disobey our laws must be stopped, not rewarded.
The President wants to crack down on those who take advantage of the shadowy existence of illegals. Amen to that, I say. Shed a light upon the massive underground economy that preys upon illegals and withholds its wages from honest US citizens.

The President is right to want reform of the US immigration system. But let us first start by demonstrating that we can fix the urgent portion of the problem, the one that prohibits us from taking full advantage of the best and brightest that the world has already sent to our shores legally: those in college; those at work in our industries. Don’t send those back. Encourage them to work here and innovate here and inspire here.

Mr. Obama also spoke about a path to citizenship for those who have broken the law. He suggested that illegals could make good if they simply paid back taxes, paid a fine, got to the back of the line and waited their turn. We’ve seen those proposals in writing and they are ridiculous. He is merely pandering to those who would vote for his party if fully enfranchised to do so.

If you truly wish to fix the immigration problem, Mr. President, do not tie it to the DREAM Act or other citizenship compromises. Fix the part that is easy. Fix the quotas, the waiting, and the arcane laws. Fix the porous border that you claim is now airtight. Last November, this issue was front and center in our collective consciousness. The State of Arizona passed their own law to defend their border because the Federal government refused to protect them. Nothing has significantly changed along the border since then to inhibit border crossings save an anemic economy to the north.

The President spoke with two tongues to tell two truths this week. With one he spun the rhetoric of the American Dream of unbridled opportunity for those who bring inspiration and imagination to America through moral and legal means. As for the other half, the story of good or bad intentions must take a back seat to the realities of the situation: illegal means illegal. Those who break the law must suffer the consequences. And the consequence of breaking the law cannot be American citizenship. The President received a lot of applause at his speech. Listen for mine: it’s the sound of one-hand clapping.

And that’s the whole truth.
Press on.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essay, Uncategorized

The Tom Wesley and John Weston Review for April 30, 2011

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized, uStream

On The Age of America: Radio Essay for April 30, 2011

Perhaps you have heard about the bombshell dropped by the International Monetary Fund earlier this week? It is a simple statement, really, yet its’ implications will transcend our very way of life. More importantly, the lives of our children and their children will be forever changed.

I am talking about the declaration that the “Age of America” is nearly behind us. The US economy will be overtaken, says the IMF, by the year 2016. That seems to be a few decades sooner than anyone expected. The analysis is based upon a concept known as Purchasing Power Parity. Think of it this way: rather than compare how many dollars one earns, think about it in terms of what those dollars can buy. If you basic lifestyle essentials cost, let’s say, 10 times less in one country than another, than one needs 10 times less money to have achieved parity in lifestyle across borders. That describes the situation in China today.

So what, you say? Let’s begin to look at the ramifications that such a change in global economic leadership might bring. First of all, let’s recall that the official name of this new economic juggernaut is the People’s Republic of China. I grew up knowing it as Communist China or Red China. It was run by Mao Zedung, a despotic leader responsible for more death than Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin combined. He ruled China until 1976. That’s just 35 years ago.

We remember life in America 35 years ago quite vividly. It was the bicentennial celebration year. America was licking its wounds from Vietnam and Watergate and Jimmy Carter was elected President. Richard Nixon, who ironically opened China to Western trade, was in a national exile. We were at the height of the Cold War with conflict in Europe seemingly imminent. The US economy, though afflicted by inflation and high interest rates, still dominated the world. The era of Pax Americana was in full flower. America ruled the waves, dominated culture, was the leader in math and science and technology, research and development. In short, America was a benevolent, though hegemonic power.

There are countless millions of Chinese who remember the days of Mao; whose political futures were shaped by his policies; and who came of age in their shadow.

Now, the US faces a future every bit as bleak as that faced by the British Empire at the end of the Second World War. Great Britain then embraced the welfare state with open arms and watched as its’ world empire and its’ world leadership position dissolved before its’ very eyes into the benevolent, waiting arms of the United States.

That case will not be repeated today. If America’s grasp on world economic and political leadership slips away, it will not fall into benevolent hands. Once they have control of the reigns, The People’s Republic of China will not play nice. We already know that they will not play fair. And the world they will dominate will be the world that we have bequeathed to our children.

Shame on us. We have the means to make the 21st Century an American Century if we have the political will to make our country competitive again. It is a multi-pronged effort lead by two major forces: (1) restoring the economy and (2) controlling our spending. Sounds easy, right? But to listen to the incessant chatter about the social compact that our President keeps espousing and that the political class in Washington regurgitates, we are not making any in progress to heading off this drastic and dramatic rendezvous with destiny, we are simply kicking the can down the road to a post-2012 election environment, counting upon continued gridlock in Washington, taking the personal vilification of noble patriots such who dare to question the status quo of the American welfare state to the level of an art form, and squandering precious time in the pursuit of personal aggrandizement.

The People’s Republic of China can’t sleep: they are too excited about the prospect of taking over the world.

Press on.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essay, Uncategorized