On The Avenue of the American Dream: Radio Essay for July 16, 2011

I guess I should have known better than to have ventured to Washington, DC to clear my head. I went to Washington playing the role as father, spouse and tourist. A funny thing happened on the way to sight see in the district: I could not help but develop a different perspective on the evolution of American history and the role government played along the way.

It started out innocuously. First, there was a quick trip to the Air and Space Museum to reacquaint myself with the tiny dimensions of the Mercury and Gemini capsules; then a swing through a food exhibit at the National Archives, not to mention a quick glimpse of the Constitution; and a compressed trip through the Museum of American History with the expressed intent to see Julia Child’s kitchen.

And there was so much more to ponder, so many classic stories of struggle and accomplishment against the great forces of man and nature. On one extreme, there were immense odds against successful exploration, such as John Glenn in outer space or Louis and Clark mapping the Louisiana Purchase. On the other extreme, there is the plucked determination exhibited by Julia Child in bringing French cuisine to an America weaned on processed foods and TV dinners. In her own kitchen, no less!
Imagination is the fuel for adventure and exploration. It requires individuals who are risk takers and are unafraid to dare. And sometimes it takes the imagination and boldness of government to stoke the fires for the good of the country.

As I walked through the many exhibits in these museums, I was struck by the historic role government played in those things for which it is uniquely capable of sponsoring. Take space exploration, for example. Not the routine launching of satellites, long ago made possible through true investment in this technology, but the hard research that exploration yields that can only be funded by government for the good of the nation. Mercury, Gemini and Apollo yielded Skylab, the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station. The Lewis and Clark expeditions supported the government vision of westward expansion in support of Manifest Destiny. No private company could legitimately do that. And only the Federal government should be in the business of directing and funding military conflicts of any kind in support of national objectives.

En route to those museums was several blocks worth of marble and granite buildings along Constitution Avenue alongside the Capitol. They were the gatekeepers to the National Mall and all the history, innovation and science that resided therein. They are the House Office buildings named after such notables as Cannon, Rayburn and Longworth. It was a Friday afternoon and there was a whole lot going on in The Hill. The debt limit impasse negotiations were in full flower.

I was suddenly awestruck by the tremendous power our Congress has over our destiny as a nation. They are not merely lawmakers focused on the day-to-day ping-pong match of point/counterpoint. Spending, national debt and taxes dominate the Congressional conversation today. Seen from space, a visitor might think that our destiny as a nation depended solely upon retirement income, childhood obesity and people who own corporate jets. Congress must also be visionaries willing to set a course for a great nation.
Who today is talking about greatness? Who today is talking about the next century? Who today will lead the planet if the United States does not? These conversations are lost amongst the partisan rancor of a warring duopoly of Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. Presidents may come and go but the Congress seems to hang in there forever. It is upon their shoulders that we must place a burden of leadership into the unknown.

We are right to honor our ancestors who forged our history in the crucible of challenge. And, in some small measure, we pay homage to their tenacity with exhibits in our national museums. But it must be so that America’s best chapters are yet to be written. We must be prepared to build more wings on the museums to chronicle the tales of adventure and achievement yet to come. That role falls upon our Congress. We owe it to our posterity to dare mighty things so that the promise of America and our unremitting quest of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness shall never fade into insignificance.

Press on.

1 Comment

Filed under uStream

On Independence Day, So Help Me God: Radio Essay for July 2, 2011

Another anniversary of American independence is upon us: number two hundred thirty five. It is quite likely that you will attend a fireworks celebration in person or hear its thunderous roar in the distance. It was John Adams, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, our first Vice President and second President of the United States, who, with a great sense of history, wrote to his wife, Abigail, about this Day of Deliverance. He said that this day “ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade…with bonfires and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever.” And so we do. I recall being present during the Bicentennial celebration at OpSail ’76 in New York Harbor as tall ship after tall ship paid homage to the home of the free and the land of the brave. And I will forever remember the fantastic fireworks display that followed.

There is another part of this famous John Adams quotation that is overlooked. In fact, it sets up the comments about the pomp and parade. This great anniversary festival, he wrote, “…ought to be commemorated…by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.”

What we celebrate on Independence Day is not simply the declaration that our country ought to be free. We celebrate the triumph of humanity as defined by “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” over eons of servitude and slavery to kings and potentates. The United States of America was, and remains, the most important of all social experiments. When the American Colonies broke from the Crown, we threw down a mighty gauntlet against autocracy that mankind ever since has emulated. We remain the freshest of democracies.

Americans have grown very cautious about speaking of our faith in public. We have effectively separated state from church and church from community. State has become defined as anything in the public domain. Our schools and communities fear any reference to faith lest we run afoul of contemporary Constitutional interpretation. But our Founders had no qualms about speaking of their devotion to the divine. In fact, our Founders were inclined to prohibit the state from controlling religion rather than exorcizing faith from the national discussion.

Is there a more eloquent or more revered personage in America than Abraham Lincoln? He said,

We have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us, and we have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own. Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us.

So, this weekend, this glorious celebration of our 235th anniversary of a free nation, feel free to understand our unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I leave you with an excerpt from the Declaration of Independence.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Happy Birthday, America, so help us God.

Press on.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essay

Twin Cities Tea Party: June 27, 2011 (Good Audio)

Leave a comment

Filed under uStream

The Tom Wesley and John Weston Review: June 25, 2011

Leave a comment

Filed under uStream

On Barriers to Entry: Radio Essay for June 25, 2011

Perhaps you have heard of the term, “barriers to entry.” In economics, it refers to obstacles that make it difficult for another to enter a given market. It could take the form of regulation or economies of scale or global reach. This gives existing firms in a market a decided advantage. At a personal level, it may require special licensing or certification to undertake a given endeavor. Imagine if the government required everyone who shoveled snow for money to undertake a back ergonomics course to protect them from back strain. Few children would be able to shovel out their neighbor’s driveway for a couple of bucks on a snowy day.

Barriers to entry tend to protect incumbents and keep competitors from gaining a foothold. If one can yield some political influence, these barriers can become impenetrable. Free markets become distorted as fewer and fewer firms can compete: oligopolies become duopolies become monopolies.
Picture for a moment our present political scene here in Massachusetts. Did you know that there are 24 political parties registered with the Secretary of State? Sounds like we have a lot of choice, right? Can you name more than 5 parties? Well, there’s Republican and Democrat: that’s two. Independent: no, that’s a state of mind, not a party. Green-Rainbow: they ran an auditor candidate, didn’t they? That’s three. Conservative: four. Liberal: What do you mean there is no liberal party in Massachusetts? Don’t need one, I guess.

Twenty four parties constitute wide choice, perhaps too much choice. Four makes it an oligopoly. At the Federal level, we shrink immediately to a duopoly: the Republicans and the Democrats. Third parties just muck up the mathematics. Without H. Ross Perot, George Herbert Walker Bush likely defeats William Jefferson Clinton and Monica Samille Lewinsky remains an anonymous college graduate with a psychology degree rather than at the center of the impeachment of a President.

So, it’s two parties for the near future. At least that is what the incumbent powers wish you to believe. Remember “barriers to entry?” Picture this. The average Congressional candidate spent $1.6 million in the last election cycle; Senators running for reelection spent $9.1 million. Additionally, elected officials traditionally campaign while serving in their current office! Incumbents have built a levee around their rank and privilege that keeps would be challengers largely at bay. Imagine trying to raise $1.6 million in two years to really fight to win a campaign. That’s $15,000 each and every week, $50 or $100 at a time, with an occasional big donor. It requires special interest vetting or even pandering to pick up a few thousand more. It requires a machine and 100% of a candidate’s time and energy. Frankly, it requires an incumbent in some government position whose electorate is content with part time constituent service.

In short, the duopoly of the three major parties has created a situation that solidifies their situations in quick setting cement. Make it past your first or second election and the barrier to entry is too steep to breach. Play your cards right and you can parlay one job into your next without regard to serving your constituents with any real personal effort. And if it doesn’t work out, you have your existing job to return to.
If the intention of our founders is to be honored in elections to come, the way we view the present duopoly must change. We need another party to offset the excesses of the duopoly without empowering either too greatly. It is less about “finding a middle ground” argument than one of pure reason. There no longer is meaningful choice. Washington is locked into an ideological struggle for power that comes at the expense of the working people of this great country. We are asked to vote for hope and change at every turn from each party but what we get is status quo.

The third party is coming. It may complement the other two or it may supplant one but its’ time is coming and it is urgent that it comes. I know of only one major movement in this country that has the determination to meaningfully work towards this end and that is the Tea Party. Not the Tea Party of the media but the Tea Party of the people: people who have had enough already of the waste, the taxes, the inequity, the deceit and the decline; people who are actively concerned about the fall; people who are ready to rise up again and again for however long it takes to return the promise of America back to all Americans, not just the political class in Washington.

Press on.

Leave a comment

Filed under Essay